16th August 2010, India are playing Sri Lanka in a tri-series game at Dambulla. Sehwag is on 99, India need a run to win. Suraj Randiv is the bowler. Randiv oversteps by a long way, by a foot in fact. His back-foot is close to overstepping as well whereas the front-foot is way over the front line. As soon as the ball is delivered, Sehwag comes down the track and launches him into the stands. Everyone for a second are delighted thinking that Sehwag has got to his hundred with that six, but since the no-ball came first, the game finished at that point, meaning Sehwag was stranded on 99
Law 24 no-ball - 11. Ball not dead
The ball does not become dead on the call of No ball.
12. Penalty for a No ball
A penalty of one run shall be awarded instantly on the call of No ball. Unless the call is revoked, this penalty shall stand even if a batsman is dismissed. It shall be in addition to any other runs scored, any boundary allowance and any other penalties awarded.
13. Runs resulting from a No ball - how scored
The one run penalty for a No ball shall be scored as a No ball extra. If other penalty runs have been awarded to either side, these shall be scored as in Law 42.17 (Penalty runs). Any runs completed by the batsmen or a boundary allowance shall be credited to the striker if the ball has been struck by the bat; otherwise they also shall be scored as No ball extras.
Also according to Law 21.6(c) which says 'If a boundary is scored before the batsmen have completed sufficient runs to win the match, then the whole of the boundary allowance shall be credited.' But this law is applicable only if the delivery bowled is a legal one and does not have any mention of what happens if it is a no-ball.
This above law needs to be looked into and needs a tweaking in order to prevent more such incidents in the future.
credit : Srivathsa
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you have some thoughts on this, I would like to read it.